Skip to main content

Stuck on the puzzle. A philosophical inquiry on OCD


The idea
 
Stuck on the puzzle. A philosophical inquiry on OCD aims to provide a philosophical understanding on experiences of compulsions, obsessions and intense uncertainty, commonly through the contribution of people experiencing such phenomena.

These experiences are typically thought of as part of an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but you do not have to be officially diagnosed as such or identify with this label in order to talk to us. 

We are a goup of philosophers interested in people’s experiences. Some of us, who are conceiving this project, do have OCD, and this is what motivates us to initiate a dialogue on this theme, bringing together philosophical resources, especially those coming from the field of phenomenology, and lived experiences. 

We are planning to create a podcast featuring a dialogue with people who have, or have had, these experiences. We believe that this kind of conversations can reveal certain aspects that are useful for society to consider, and also interesting to ponder from a philosophical perspective. 
Our belief is that people who live these experiences may contribute to a better understanding of these conditions, and may also provide support to people who feel similarly. 

Our aim is not to establish a diagnosis, or anything like that, rather to have an interesting conversation where people feel welcome, heard, and safe.

We are looking for volunteers who are willing to come talk to us on the podcast on the following issues: 
- compulsive checking (for instance, checking electrical appliances and plug sockets over and over)
- obsessive thoughts and questioning (e.g. intrusive thoughts, superstitious thinking)
- washing and cleaning compulsions
- collecting and hoarding compulsions

The conversation would be recorded and published. There would be options to preserve your anonymity, if you wish. We are thinking that we might want to talk to people twice, having an initial discussion first, and then a follow-up discussion later down the line. But the second one is not a requirement. 

You do not have to be a philosopher yourself to talk to us, as we are primarily interested in having conversations with people from all walks of life. We would find it interesting, for instance, to talk about what people going through heightened feelings of uncertainty and ambiguous experiences have found useful or not so useful when dealing with these. Or to talk about experiences of this sort that can be difficult to understand even as we are going through them. 
We are hoping to create something together that could help other people struggling with similar challenges.

If you would be interested in talking with us, please contact us at ocdproject23@gmail.com

This project is born under the Renewing Phenomenological Psychopathology Co-production Scheme.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who we are

Members of the research project are... Francesca Brencio is Associate Researcher at the Research Group "Filosofía Aplicada: Sujeto, Sufrimiento, Sociedad" at the University of Seville (Spain), and member of The Collaborating Centre for Values-based Practice at the S. Catherine College at the University of Oxford (UK). She leads the Pheno-Lab, A Theoretical Laboratory on Philosophy and Mental Health . She also works as a philosophical counselor. More info at: https://us.academia.edu/FrancescaBrencio https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francesca-Brencio Susi Ferrarello , is associate professor at California State University, East Bay. She has a Ph.D. in Philosophy from the Sorbonne in Paris, a master’s in Human Rights and Political Science from the University of Bologna. Among her books, The Ethics of Love (Routledge, 2023), Human Emotions and the Origin of Bioethics (Routledge, 2021), Husserl's Ethics and Practical Intentionality (Bloomsbury, 2015). She writes for Psychol

Anti-Curiosity Exercises, Plutarch, and Quitting Obsessions

 As someone with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and as someone who is really into trying the various exercises that philosophers like to prescribe sometimes, I always wonder how various philosophical practices would interact with my disorder. I gave myself a challenge for the year 2024: to commit to practicing one new philosophical exercise each month, and to write about it on my blog .   Because of the Stuck on the Puzzle project, I decided, for January 2024, to take on Plutarch’s anti-curiosity exercises, described in his essay On Curiosity [1]   Indeed, I was specifically interested in seeing if those exercises could help counteract OCD. Reflecting on my own OCD, I came to agree with Juliette Vazard’s assessment that this disorder must have something to do with a dysfunction of the mechanism that normally leads someone to pick out things worth inquiring into [2] .  She describes two linked affective mechanisms: one mechanism to assess if a proposition has stakes that are pragmat